What you’ll need
- Claude Pro or ChatGPT Plus — For drafting. Claude wins on long-form; ChatGPT wins on research.
- Surfer SEO or Frase — For SEO scoring and keyword targeting.
- The tool you’re reviewing — You actually need to use it — minimum 4 weeks per our methodology.
- A screenshot tool — CleanShot or built-in Mac/Windows screenshots work fine. You need ~6 originals per review.
The 7-step workflow
Step 1: Pull 3 competitor reviews (20 minutes)
Open the top 3 ranking review posts for “
Step 2: Document your hands-on test (30 minutes)
Write rough notes from your 4-week test (per our methodology): 7-dimension scores, 3 specific pros, 3 specific cons, the moment something surprised you. These notes become the originality the AI cannot fabricate.
Step 3: Generate the outline with AI (10 minutes)
Prompt: “Generate an outline for a 2,200-word review of [tool]. Audience: affiliate marketers. Include: hands-on verdict, 7-dimension scorecard, pricing math at 3 usage tiers, FAQ, alternatives. Order from most to least commercial intent.” Then trim 20% — first drafts are always bloated.
Step 4: Draft section by section (50 minutes)
For each H2, feed the AI: (1) your hands-on notes for that section, (2) the section prompt from the outline. Generate, edit hard. Your hands-on notes are the data; the AI handles the structure and prose. Repeat 6–8 times per post.
Step 5: Add original screenshots (10 minutes)
Drop 5–7 real screenshots of you using the tool. Include the dashboard, a result you generated, and any quirk worth showing. This is the single biggest EEAT signal for tool reviews.
Step 6: Score against Surfer or Frase (15 minutes)
Paste the draft into your SEO scoring tool. Hit the target score (typically 75+) without over-stuffing. Most early drafts come in at 50–60; small additions usually close the gap.
Step 7: Final pass and publish (10 minutes)
Read aloud once. Check the verdict matches your scores. Add the methodology badge, FAQ schema, and affiliate disclosure. Hit publish.
Pro tip
The reason this workflow finishes in 2 hours is the 30 minutes of hands-on notes upfront. Skip that step and you’ll spend 4 hours arguing with the AI to produce a defensible verdict it cannot have. Real test data feeds real reviews.
FAQ
Can I do this with the free tier of an AI tool?
Yes — Claude Free and ChatGPT Free both handle the drafting workflow. The free tiers have lower context windows so you’ll need to draft one section at a time instead of pasting the full outline.
Will Google penalize an AI-assisted review?
No — Google’s helpful content policy targets unhelpful content, not the tool that produced it. Reviews with original test data, screenshots, and named author bios rank identically to fully human-written ones.
How long should the review be?
2,000–2,500 words for most affiliate tool reviews. Longer for category-defining tools (Jasper, ChatGPT). Shorter for niche tools. Match the typical length of page-1 ranking posts in your specific SERP.
Should I include affiliate links?
Yes — with proper disclosure at the top and on every link. Cloaked links (/go/jasper) make link maintenance easier; track via UTM parameters for attribution.
What about AI detection?
Pass-rate on AI detectors matters less than Google ranking. Posts with strong original data (screenshots, scores, prices) rank well even when they flag as 60%+ AI. If detection is a contract requirement, run output through a humanizer like Koala AI’s humanize mode.
Get the next tutorial in your inbox
1,000+ subscribers get tested AI workflows every Sunday.
Last verified: 28 May 2026 · methodology · Affiliate disclosure
You're in — check your inbox!
Your toolkit is on its way. If you don't see it in 2 minutes, check your spam folder.