Make.com vs Zapier 2026: I Tested Both for 90 Days

I tested Make.com and Zapier across 12 production workflows on a real affiliate site for 10 weeks. This is the broad side-by-side: pricing, integrations, ease of use, error handling, and the new AI features both rolled out in 2026. Verdict tailored by team size at the end.

Specifically running an affiliate site? See the workflow-by-workflow breakdown at Make vs Zapier for Affiliate Marketers. For full Make context, see the main Make.com Review.

โš ๏ธ Affiliate disclosure: Links to Make.com and Zapier in this post are affiliate links. I earn a commission if you purchase through them. I tested both tools across my affiliate content pipeline for 10+ weeks.

I switched from Zapier to Make.com 14 months ago. I haven’t looked back. But that doesn’t mean Zapier is a bad tool โ€” it means Make.com is the better fit for affiliate marketers who want visual workflow control and don’t want to pay Zapier’s pricing.

Quick verdict: which one I use and why

I use Make.com. The visual workflow builder, the better free plan, and the lower per-operation cost at scale made it the clear choice for my affiliate marketing automation stack. Zapier is more beginner-friendly and has more integrations โ€” but for the workflows affiliate marketers actually need, Make.com handles everything and costs less doing it.

Comparison table: Make.com vs Zapier side by side

FeatureMake.comZapier
Free planโœ… 1,000 ops/monthโœ… 100 tasks/month
Paid entry price$9/month (10,000 ops)$20/month (750 tasks)
Workflow builderโœ… Visual canvasโš ๏ธ Linear steps (simpler)
Multi-step automationsโœ… Unlimited complexityโš ๏ธ Complex on higher tiers
Error handlingโœ… Built-in, granularโš ๏ธ More limited
Number of integrations1,700+6,000+
Ease of use for beginnersโš ๏ธ Steeper learning curveโœ… Simpler to start
Affiliate commission20% recurringNo affiliate program

Ease of use: which is easier to learn?

Zapier wins for pure beginner simplicity. Its interface is linear โ€” trigger, then action. You can set up your first automation in 10 minutes. Make.com has a steeper learning curve. The visual canvas approach takes a few hours to get comfortable with. But after two weeks, I was building more sophisticated automations in Make.com than I ever built in Zapier after two years using it.

Power and flexibility: complex workflows

For complex affiliate marketing workflows โ€” multi-step content pipelines, conditional logic, iterators โ€” Make.com is significantly more capable. A real example from my affiliate operation: I built a Make.com workflow that monitors Google Search Console for posts dropping in rankings, automatically creates a Trello card with post details, sends a Slack notification, and adds the post to a Google Sheets “needs update” table. All in one scenario. That kind of multi-branch workflow with multiple data sources is either impossible or prohibitively complex in Zapier.

Integrations: which connects to more affiliate tools?

Zapier has more total integrations (6,000+ vs Make.com’s 1,700+). In practice, this rarely matters for affiliate marketers. Both platforms connect to every tool in a typical affiliate stack: WordPress, Google Sheets, Gmail, ConvertKit, Slack, Airtable, Notion, Trello, ActiveCampaign. The Zapier integration advantage mostly applies to niche enterprise tools.

Pricing: real cost at different usage levels

Usage levelMake.com costZapier cost
Free tier$0 (1,000 ops/mo)$0 (100 tasks/mo)
Light use (~5,000 tasks/mo)$9/month$20/month
Medium use (~20,000 tasks/mo)$16/month$49/month
Heavy use (~100,000 tasks/mo)$29/month$69+/month

Make.com is consistently cheaper at every tier. At medium usage, the difference is $33/month โ€” nearly $400/year. Over a two-year affiliate site build, that’s real money reinvested into content or tools.

Best affiliate workflows on Make.com (with examples)

1. New post โ†’ social distribution pipeline
New WordPress post โ†’ auto-create Twitter/X post, pin to Pinterest, schedule LinkedIn update. Saves 20 minutes per publish.

2. Rank tracking โ†’ content update queue
Weekly GSC data pull โ†’ filter posts ranking position 8โ€“20 โ†’ add to “optimise this week” Airtable table with current keyword data.

3. Email subscriber โ†’ welcome sequence trigger
New ConvertKit subscriber โ†’ personalised first email with signup source โ†’ correct tag segment based on lead magnet used โ†’ log to Google Sheet.

When Zapier is actually the better choice

My recommendation for affiliate marketers

Start with Make.com’s free plan (1,000 operations per month). Build your first two or three scenarios. The learning curve pays off within two weeks. Once comfortable, the $9/month Core plan handles the automation needs of most affiliate sites efficiently. Only consider Zapier if you specifically need an integration that Make.com doesn’t offer.

About the author
Mithun Srivastava

Mithun writes on investing & automation. He runs investwithmithun.com (market education) and automatetoprofit.com (trading automation).

Free ยท No credit card

Send me the toolkit

The exact 50-tool shortlist + 30-day playbook I used to build profitable affiliate sites — delivered instantly.

No spam. Unsubscribe with one click.

  • Delivered instantly
  • No credit card
  • Unsubscribe anytime

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

⚡ Free Interactive Tools

Start With These.
No Email. No Paywall.

Three tools to help you pick the right AI path, compare the best tools, and estimate your income potential โ€” all free in your browser.

✓ No sign-up required  ·  ✓ Works on mobile  ·  ✓ Results are instant

Also by Mithun
Invest With Mithun

Stock-market education, frameworks & calculators to make smarter investing decisions.

Visit InvestWithMithun →